Other points being considered

*Context is another aspect i would like to alter i believe by placing this building in a rural environment this could create a sense of contrast and hence accentuate the experience and create a greater sense of appreciation towards the buildings unique modern design.

*Although the structure and design of the museum is quite complex, i believe incorporating materiality, colour and texture internally may intensify the viewers experience of the museum without deferring from but rather complimenting the artworks displayed.

*A fine arts museum I believe is created for the purpose of showcasing works and inspiring the viewer by provoking the artistic gene; also being in a day and age of digital medium i believe the implementation of a touch screen sensitive graffiti wall upon entrance could promote viewer interaction and would be a significant contribution to the redesign of this building.

*I have noticed that a few other students have judged the ramp in jorn utzons design of the silkeborg to be a significant protrusion which is protruding and deviating from the structure of the building by occupying a large volume of the building and preventing the sense of flowing circulation that Jorn seemed to soo strongly promote in his description of his design. i believe if this ramps materiality was altered with the use of transparency and increased width this aspect will be improved or illiminated.

*Also to a degree the Silkeborg design looks like a scattered building due to the random arrangement of spaces in an attempt to manipulate light into the building. However if i was the impliment the addition of a transparent roof this may enable the convergence of the buildings elements while still maintaining the passive entrance of light throughout the structure and the appreciation of each element independantly and as a whole.